The Humane Treatment of Animals

by GSDbyDesign_editor 23. August 2009 00:10

The following was written by Dave Fritsche, a fellow GSD enthusiast and GSDCA Board member. It is reprinted here with permission.

-----------------------------------------

I AM SO MAD.......

 

I am so hot I could spit quarters and have the make change before they hit the ground.

I am so hot I could fry eggs on my forehead...

I am so mad even my mother doesn't love me right now!

 

I just got back from Walmart, you know the big box store with all the little smiley faces slashing prices, while the store manager is running around putting them back up where they belong.

 

Well, we decided to go get some irrigation hose splices at Home Depot, then over to Walmart to get some ice cream, and grandson David was with us. When we finished our shopping we went tot he parking lot to hear a dog barking in a car somewhere near, and that is one thing that I cannot stand and will not stand. So, I left Linda and David in our car, with the motor running and A/C on high and went off to rescue the little dog.

 

First step was to give the crazy idiots (Is that cursing? I try not to use profanity, except possibly in cases like this) a chance to come rescue their own dog, so I got the license number, description of the car and the dog and went into Walmart. The guy straightening the baskets didn't seem to want to get involved, so I grabbed the first employee I found with a radio on her waste and let her know about the dog. The temperature on our in car thermometer was at 110 degrees, meaning the parking lot outside was really hot. The air temperature was supposed to be in the mid to high 90's so I was thinking the little doggy was getting roasted slowly and would soon be ready for thanksgiving dinner - except this is August and all I wanted was ice cream.

 

Well, Walmart, bless their little hearts, announced the dilemma several times and called animal control. Finally I announced to them that I was going back out and break into the car and get the dog out.

I went back to the car and Linda and little David to find three Walmart employees on their break at the car, each with their phone open calling animal control, the sheriff, and God knows who else.

Another employee came out ta say they had five people report the situation and that animal control was on the way. Then another passed by (A crowd of 8 or 10 people now gathered) with a phone to her ear, and then let us know that the Sheriff had received 7 calls already and that animal control was almost there.

 

In the mean time, people were giving me ice and water to give to the dog through the little slit in the window. And I was throwing it into the back seat for the dog. I'm really sorry for any damage that might have occurred to the car or its upholstery in this cause. Finally I went back to the car and decided that an hour had passed, animal control was not there and the little dog was now down on the floor board panting feverishly. So I got my fingers through the window and was ready to pull the window out, when one of the nice concerned ladies shouted, "There they are. They are here!"

 

Looking up I saw the animal control van and we all waved for them to come our way. The nice lady officer stuck a digital thermometer into the window crack and said, "110 degrees. Were entering it!" Over an hour had passed and It was indeed time. The officer, bless her heart, started trying to enter the doors, but finding them locked, reached for her little spring pop devise that breaks windows. I wish now, I had just let her do it, but I got my hands inside and on top of the window and was able to force it down enough to get my arm in and unlock the door.

 

The officer got the dog out and started pouring water over it and everyone was cheering. Then the owners arrived. I am not sure what happened then, but some of the crowd were asking me to back off and the animal control lady said that I had helped enough and that possible I should go now. The owners were hiding behind the animal control van and the officer was explaining that they could not have their dog back until she got it cooled doan and evaluated by a vet. They could check in with the office on Monday.

 

All in all, I was delighted with the response of the passers by and their concern and with Walmart and their actions and with the nice animal control officer. I also know why I should not have a CCW permit.

 

I'm drinking a soda on ice, and I'll probably cool down before evening. Did I ever tell anyone why I love dogs and not always people.

Dave

 

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

HSUS - Swine Flu Hysteria - and why is it called Swine Flu?

by GSDbyDesign_editor 2. May 2009 14:04

 Cattlegrower.com has this thought-provoking blog entry Saturday, May 2, 2009. The author is Chad Golladay.

 

“Rule one,” White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told The New York Times last November, is “never allow a crisis to go to waste.”

But despite some accusations of fear-mongering, the White House clearly seems to understand that not every crisis should be exploited. In response to the growing panic over a new strain of swine influenza A (H1N1) discovered last week in Mexico, President Obama assured Americans today that the H1N1 virus is “not a cause for alarm.”

Sadly, not everyone is following the Commander-in-Chief’s lead. For animal rights activists at the Humane Society of the United States, the opportunity to use “swine flu” to scare American meat-eaters was apparently too tempting to resist.


The mouthpiece for HSUS’ latest anti-meat effort is Michael Greger. Over the years, Greger has shamelessly leveraged public panic over bird flu, mad cow disease, and SARS to promote meatless eating. Now we can add so-called "swine flu" to Greger’s list.

According to HSUS, there is no question that American pork producers are to blame for the latest flu outbreak:

With massive concentrations of farm animals within which to mutate, these new swine flu viruses in North America seem to be on an evolutionary fast track, jumping and reassorting between species at an unprecedented rate. 

Sounds scary enough. But before we start quarantining every piece of ham and bacon in sight, let’s look at what other public health experts have been saying.

Dr. Anne Schuchat dispelled pork contamination rumors at the first Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) press briefing on Thursday:

You know, when you hear the word swine influenza you think about swine and many people wonder can you get this from eating pork?  The answer is no you can't get swine flu from eating pork or from eating pork products.  So that's not something that you need to worry about. 

The CDC quickly reiterated Schuchat’s point in a Q&A on its website:  

Can I get swine influenza from eating or preparing pork?

No. Swine influenza viruses are not spread by food. You cannot get swine influenza from eating pork or pork products. Eating properly handled and cooked pork products is safe.

Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack concurred in a statement on behalf of the Department of Agriculture yesterday:

According to scientists at USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, swine flu viruses are not transmitted by food so you cannot get swine flu from eating pork or pork products. Eating properly handled and cooked pork or pork products is safe. Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160°F kills all viruses and other foodborne pathogens.

The World Health Organization also joined the chorus:

Is it safe to eat pork and pork products?

Yes. Swine influenza has not been shown to be transmissible to people through eating properly handled and prepared pork (pig meat) or other products derived from pigs.

Finally, President Obama assured Americans this morning that the new virus strain is no cause for alarm. 

So if it’s impossible to contract swine flu from eating or handling cooked pork, why is it called “swine flu? in the first place” The World Organization for Animal Health in Paris (the "OIE," in its French acronym) has an interesting answer: It shouldn’t be.

The flu virus spreading around the world should not be called "swine flu" as it also contains avian and human components and no pig was found ill with the disease so far, the World Animal Health body said on Monday.

A more logical name for it would be "North-American influenza."

Renaming the virus makes sense to us, but don’t expect to hear much logic from HSUS. To the animal rights giant, the tragic but minimal death toll in Mexico is an opportunity to stoke fears of animal agriculture -- and avoid letting a precious crisis go to waste.

Michael Greger’s anti-pork panic is just the latest example of why dietary zealots shouldn’t be mistaken for reliable health experts. The modern farming practices that HSUS condemns as a source of the swine flu virus are probably humans’ best firewall against the disease. Modern farming keeps animals in controlled environments, where they are far less susceptible to contagion and pandemics. “Free-range” pork, on the other hand, is more likely to spread diseases through communal contact and uncontrolled contact with people.

Source:  The Center for Consumer Freedom
 

Currently rated 1.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 1/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Take 2

by GSDbyDesign_editor 9. April 2009 20:21
We tried to embed it for you, but since this blog software bites, we will have to settle for the link.

This is Ben Stein on "The Divinity of Dogs."

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4920260n

 

Currently rated 1.0 by 3 people

  • Currently 1/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Enough said

by GSDbyDesign_editor 9. April 2009 20:10
[No text]

Currently rated 1.0 by 2 people

  • Currently 1/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , ,

It's really up to all of us

by GSDbyDesign_editor 1. December 2008 23:51

Last week, I had a "new puppy owner" phone call that started with a phrase such as, "The vet said . . ." and ended with a scared owner who was sure her new dog was either going to die, be lame for life, or require expensive surgery.

Throughout our years of breeding, we have had our fair share of incompetant vets misdiagnose some of our Shepherd puppies. These illnesses (and I use the term loosely) have ranged from irresponsible to just down-right bizarre. But this one call struck a chord.

First, a little history: This is an 8-month-old puppy from a litter of seven. He was purchased at 10 weeks old, strong, healthy, agile and fearless. The litter, although almost entirely German-bred, turned out to be quite angulated. As they grew, several new owners called to check with us on what they perceived to be a possible hip problem; some just said their dog was "walking funny."

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Ours is a breed built unlike any other. It is our responsibility to proactivelyapproach
this issue before it is too late. With AR organizations on everystreet corner,
it is only a matter of time before we hear them liken rearangulation to
tail-docking. Together, we can be part of the solution. It really is up to all of us.

__________________________________________________________________________________


And so it went with the owners in question. We explained the pups were more extreme than we had anticipated, agreed to take a look at their little male, and reassured the owners that all was well - that this was a phase he would certainly outgrow. Then another call came. This time, the owners were concerned about his gait. People they met during the pup's daily walks were questioning his rear. We reminded them that he was growing and that this was normal. We also suggested a trip to the vet for a lyme check, and maybe to see if there was a bit of pano.

And that, ladies and gentleman, is where the trouble started. 

The owners' vet suspected an orthopedic problem and sent them to a specialist. The lyme tests were not done. No one checked for pano. And no one called us - until three months had passed and the owners were terrified. 

The first so-called expert manipulated this puppy's hips, made them pop until he yelped, and told the owners that the dog was dysplastic. Alas, xrays showed perfect hips. Still seeing a "funny" gait, they next took the dog to another "expert," who told them that the puppy suffered from a congenital disease affecting his hocks and would require expensive surgery. (A little research revealed that this same veterinary practice also happens to have pioneered the surgery they recommended.)

At this point, the owners contact us. After I regained my composure, I explained that I was simply awe-struck at the blatant idiocy of these vets. I strongly urged them to have the lyme test done - at a lab - and to check for pano. They did. The puppy has lyme disease. Oh, and it turns out that the congenital hock issue means he is cow-hocked.

If you're still reading, thank you. I realize this is a long story - and undoubtedly one most breeders have experienced in one form or another. But here's the thing: What can be done? How many times do we (breeders) have to listen to terrified owners at the other end of the phone? Or worse: angry buyers who are convinced they were duped by disreputable breeders? 

In this particular case, I don't think it is entirely the vets who are at fault. The buyers called for advice, initially, but didn't follow it. In fact, they are still convinced that the puppy has a congential hock disease. (When they send those xrays to OFA, however, I am pretty sure they will find that the puppy's knees were dislocated when taking the films. Won't that be a joy to explain?)

So what's to be done? No matter how much breeders screen buyers, no matter how often we recommend a particular vet or spend hours offering advice from our considerable knowledge bank on this breed, we still get these calls. We still end up defending ourselves, instead of helping the dogs. We still have to explain that although a vet has paperwork framed on the wall, he or she is not the sole bearer of wisdom when it comes to German Shepherds. We still remind owners to question their vets' advice the same way they would with their child's doctor.

A buyer is confused and scared. They understandably don't want to return a dog they are now very attached to. But they are unable or unwilling to listen to the very people who know the dog best.

Do we, breeders, band together? Form a coalition? Hold educational seminars for vets? Launch a website to educate the pet-buying population?

Ours is a breed built unlike any other. It is our responsibility to proactively approach this issue before it is too late. With AR organizations seemingly on every street corner, it is only a matter of time before we hear them liken rear angulation to tail-docking. Together, we can be part of the solution. It really is up to all of us.

Currently rated 2.1 by 7 people

  • Currently 2.142857/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , , ,

Welcome!

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.1.0.7
Theme by Mads Kristensen

About the author

Becky T. Dickson
Editor www.GSDbyDesign.com

E-mail me Send mail

Calendar

<<  February 2012  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728291234
567891011

View posts in large calendar

Pages

Recent comments

Categories


Archive

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2012

Sign in